The publicly edited encyclopedia, Wikipedia, is being threatened with a lawsuit by the FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation) for using their seal, in one of the site's descriptive entries. The FBI misapplied the law, stating it is federal statute that one must obtain their authorization, before embarking on using their seal, for any purpose.
Said law was enacted to prevent people from posing as FBI agents or affiliates, not speaking or writing freely about the corrupt agency, which is protected by the U.S. Constitution. Anyone with commonsense can ascertain, Wikipedia did not try to pose as an entity affiliated with the FBI or its parent agency, the DOJ (Department of Justice). The FBI thinks too highly of itself and their so-called seal of approval.
The true motive for the incident is, the FBI is looking for any reason to attack Wikipedia, due to the scandal its sister site, Wikileaks, unleashed on the U.S. government, by publishing 90,000 classified documents on the ill-fated war in Afghanistan. This is the manner in which the FBI operates, when they wish to terrorize a target. They invent items to bully the person or entity.
As many of you know, in the summer of 2008, a brutish, ill-tempered, butch, Los Angeles FBI spokeswoman, named Laura Eimiller, lost her ever loving mind and angrily contacted the Judiciary Report, complaining about a comedic article on the site she wanted removed. So much for free press, but the FBI has never been one to follow the law, as attested by their all too frequent appearances in Congress for flagrantly breaking it.
Around that time, the Judiciary Report had used the FBI's seal in published articles, to be representative of the agency. However, once again, as anyone with commonsense should have been able to deduce, the Judiciary Report is not a fan of the FBI. Therefore, no endorsement or affiliation was implied in any measure.
Furthermore, who would want to be affiliated with the agency, many specialists and former FBI agents stated, arranged the assassination of the greatest American ever, Martin Luther King Jr. People only deal with them, because of their congressional mandate to investigate and prosecute federal crimes, making them unavoidable in that respect.
In the summer 2009 lawsuit, Aisha v. FBI, I wrote of the FBI's misconduct in illegally accessing my computers using their spyware CIPAV and copying its contents, due to the UNPUBLISHED political articles written for the Judiciary Report site and other lawful documents of interest to them, when they were supposed to be investigating misconduct I reported to them.
As I know a number of influential people in various walks of life, the FBI took to UNLAWFULLY mining my LAWFUL phone calls, emails and computer contents, for exclusives and tips they sought to use before I did, which is not only unethical, it is illegal conduct the Federal Bureau of Investigation should not be engaging in. There are noted, well-documented incidents of the FBI engaging in this misbehavior.
About two years ago, the Judiciary Report used the FBI's seal in a few articles and noticed that during one of the hacks into my computer that publishes the site, a hacker removed the FBI's seal from the site, which left a big red X, where it should have been displaying. The original copy had the FBI seal, but the version of the site that was transferred, then publish, did not contain it and was the only picture missing.
I put the seal back and it showed temporarily. But then someone hacked the site and removed the seal again. I put the seal back again and once more, someone hacked the site and removed it. The fourth time I put the seal back, the hacker gave up and did not remove it again. Therefore, it is apparent, the FBI has mental issues about people using their seal, using it as an excuse, even going so far as harassing people, whilst twisting the law.
RELATED ARTICLES
Obama Fears More WikiLeaks Leaks
Obama Wants Wikileaks Founder Arrested
Wikileaks Exposes U.S. Gov Corruption In Afghanistan
